Original US release date: July 1, 2011
Production budget: $30,000,000
Worldwide gross: $72,008,245
Back in 2011, Tom Hanks released Larry Crowne, a film that he directed and co-wrote, along with Nia Vardalos. The marketing mostly centered around the fact that the film co-starred Hanks and Julia Roberts. It wasn’t their first film together, but it was the first where they both played to type. Despite that, the box office returns were mediocre and the reviews were even worse. Hanks and Roberts are two of the biggest, most-beloved movie stars of the last thirty years. How could something that seemed like such a sure thing go so wrong? What happened? Was the film really that bad?
Larry Crowne follows the eponymous Larry Crowne, portrayed by Hanks. Larry is the typical wholesome good guy that has largely defined Hanks’s career – or at least the public perception of his career. When Larry is let go from his longtime sales position at a mass-market retailing chain for not having a college education (and therefore possessing the least upside of anyone else at the location), he decides to rectify his situation by finally pursuing a degree. He enrolls at a local community college and learns more about himself than is dictated by any syllabi, just as he affects the other students and his professors by injecting his infectious optimism into their lives.
The role of Larry Crowne does little to nothing to push Hanks to the boundaries of his talents, but it’s still an endearing part and it’s always nice to see Hanks play this sort of fatherly, uplifting character to supplement the more challenging roles that he has also tackled during his career. He is surrounded by a stellar supporting cast, led by Julia Roberts. Roberts plays Larry’s speech professor, Mercy Tainot. Mercy is cynical and beaten – her enthusiasm for life stamped out by the people around her. Her students are uninspired and her husband (Bryan Cranston) sits at home all day, looking at PG-13 photos of women in their underwear (the movie’s interpretation of “porn”).
Backing up Hanks and Roberts is a who’s-who of talented actors – many of whom have gone on to become huge names in their own right. Included in the cast is the aforementioned Cranston, Taraji P. Henson, Cedric the Entertainer, George Takei, Pam Grier, Rami Malek, Gugu Mbatha-Raw (who should be a much bigger star than she is), Wilmer Valderrama, and Hanks’s real-life wife Rita Wilson. Of this group, contributing the most to the film are Malik and Mbatha-Raw. As a college professor, myself, I can confirm that Malik’s Steve Dibiasi is the most like a real-life college student. He provides much of the film’s humor (of which there is quite a bit, and pretty much all of it lands, to some degree) and is supremely likable in spite of Dibiasi’s annoying tendencies and entitled approach to life. Mbatha-Raw’s Talia is a fellow student who takes an immediate liking to Larry and helps him adapt to modern-day college life. Talia is an unusually upbeat character for Mbatha-Raw, who typically plays more serious parts. It’s refreshing to see her smiling and joking and revealing a rarely-seen side of herself, displaying some versatility along the way. She’s exuberant and adds an element of life and energy to the film that would have been noticeably lacking without her presence.
So, what happened? Why didn’t the film blow the box office away and rack up $200+ million in worldwide box office receipts? Three things, I believe:
- The reviews. As I mentioned, the reviews were rather critical of the film upon its release. Or, at least, on first glance. Upon further inspection, they generally acknowledge that the film has it’s positives, but plays it too safe. I can’t argue that it’s not safe. But it’s also so entertaining and charming along the way that it shouldn’t really matter, in my estimation. I laughed quite a bit, I enjoyed the performances, and I was invested in the characters. I can deal with safe.
- The title. Honestly, does Larry Crowne stand out as a title in any meaningful way, at all? Even when I hear the title, myself, I have to ransack my memory in order to recall which movie it was and what it was about. Unless the character is already a household name, titling a film with just said character’s name is risky. I have always maintained that John Carter would have performed at least somewhat better at the box office if it had been called John Carter of Mars. Sometimes, it works out (such as with John Wick), but it’s a gamble.
- The marketplace. This film was released on July 1, right in the middle of blockbuster season. What was it up against? A week prior saw the release of Cars 2. On the same day as Larry Crowne was released, Transformers: Dark of the Moon also hit theaters. Midnight in Paris and The Town were also still hanging around, pulling in the adult crowds with counterprogramming. Had the movie opened in the spring or the fall, I think it would have gotten more attention and performed more admirably at the box office. Even with mostly-underwhelming reviews, people love Tom Hanks and Julia Roberts and want to support them. But timing matters.
So, while Larry Crowne isn’t an exercise in groundbreaking filmmaking, it’s still a fun, delightful time with laughs and wit abound. It’s sadly been forgotten in the six years since its release, but it’s an appropriate movie to watch when one is in the mood for something light and uplifting. And it’s a fun game of Spot-the-Future-Star, to boot! Larry Crowne isn’t an all-time classic, but it deserves better than its reputation – or its lack thereof – suggests.
Like us on Facebook!
Leave a Reply